Pulp of the Day
The Human Bat v. The Robot Gangster by Edward R. Home-Gall
Written by PulpoftheDay on November 10th, 2008If you can’t come up with a nifty caption for this cover, you really aren’t trying.
5 captions so far ↓
Leave a caption
You must be logged in to post a caption.
10
AM
Human Bat drops a load of chilled guano on the freestyle rapping boom box of Robot Gangster: “Take that you metallic Ebonics offender!”
10
AM
As with all of Kool Keith’s recent albums, i’m preparing for disappointment.
10
AM
Sure, Bender. Sure.
10
PM
As you’ll know from your homework, the case of Human Bat v. Robot Gangster, 123 U.S. 97(1923) was a nuanced piece of legal reasoning by the Supreme Court which first described the legal concept that has come to be known as Emminent Domain. The Plaintiff, one Human Bat, successfully fought off attempts by the Robot Gangster to impede the progress of the Human Bat’s railroad through unimproved land owned by The Robot Gangster. Had the Robot Gangster built anything of import upon the land, the case would most likely have gone against the Human Bat. These rulings stood until the recent case of Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) which states that the government can steal your land and give it to any private person it likes for any reason it likes.
10
PM
Batman and Ironman before they changed their names and became cool!